I mentioned that I was trying a writing experiment with POV. It’s taken more time than I expected it to, but I met my goals. Each day this week, I’ve put one part of a short story on my webpage, with one more to go up tomorrow. Each part was from a different POV character. What have I learned?
It’s fun writing from the villain/antagonist’s POV. I don’t do that very often. As a matter of fact, I use third person, single POV in every series I write except Fallen Angels. Those are the only books I write with multiple POV, and I still rarely write from the villain’s veiwpoint. I think it might be hard to do without giving too much away, but it worked for a short piece. And letting myself live inside Merlot’s head helped me understand her more. I read once that villains don’t think of themselves as bad or wrong. Instead, they focus on what they want, what they’re striving to do, and they justify their actions. They often feel they’ve been wronged, and they’re putting things right. Merlot has that tendency. Hezra, on the other hand, (in part 4), decided to turn to the dark arts and makes no bones about the fact that she wants power. It was fun writing from her perspective, too, but I still wanted to make her an individual–not just the “evil” who battles my protagonist.
I’m putting up the last part of the story tomorrow–the big showdown–but this experiment has made me think more about villains/antagonists. For me, Ilona Andrews’s Kate Daniels series really got interesting when she had Hugh D’Ambray walk onto the pages to play mind games with Kate and to battle her and Curran. For me, she created two of the most intriguing “bad guys” I’ve read for a long time when Hugh and Kate’s father, Roland, became active in the series. Not that she hasn’t had a strong, almost invincible enemy in every book. That’s part of urban fantasy, but Hugh and Roland are unpredictable and do the unexpected, and that’s made them really interesting. She’s made them such a blend of good and bad that the reader has mixed feelings about them. It’s sort of like reading The Silence of the Lambs. I hated Dr. Chilton more than Hannibal Lecter. Odd, right? But a really well-done villain can pull a reader’s emotions in strange directions. For that reason, I’ve decided to spend just as much time on my villains and antagonists as I do on my protagonists from now on. They can really make a story zing.
What a great idea- writing from the antagonist pov. I’ve enjoyed what I’ve read- and plan to finish your stories. They are powerful and compelling. I love present tense!
Cheers to you!
LikeLike
Thanks, Sue!
LikeLike
I’ve never written from the antagonist’s POV, if for no other reason than I’d end up liking him or her more than I want to. 🙂
LikeLike
But that’s good. That makes them interesting:)
LikeLike
Interesting. Writing memoir you basically always work from your own POV, but a large part of the work I do is an effort to have empathy for those who have touched and shaped my life, to come to understand them, and to depict them with as much honesty and fairness as possible. Of course in some sense that is essentially impossible. As one of my writing teachers once said, everyone is the protagonist of their own story; no one sees themselves as a supporting character in yours. And certainly not as antagonist.
LikeLike
This was more work than I expected, but it made me realize I learn characters and they deepen as I plod along, so each POV took me a while to get into. I had the basics in my head, but there’s so much more to people than that, and that took time. Lots of rewrites.
LikeLike
Many thanks for “stopping by” and taking the time to read my silliness. Always appreciate and am humbled when people take that kind of time to “read me”. 🙂
LikeLike
It was a fun post. I enjoyed it. And good luck with the super glue:)
LikeLike